首页> 外文OA文献 >Survey of Advanced Booster Options for Potential Shuttle Derivative Vehicles
【2h】

Survey of Advanced Booster Options for Potential Shuttle Derivative Vehicles

机译:潜在的航天飞机衍生车辆高级助力器选项调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A never-ending major goal for the Space Shuttle program is to continually improve flight safety, as long as this launch system remains in operational service. One of the options to improve system safety and to enhance vehicle performance as well, that has been seriously studied over the past several decades, is to replace the existing strap-on four segment solid rocket boosters (SRB's) with more capable units. A number of booster upgrade options have been studied in some detail, ranging from five segment solids through hybrids and a wide variety of liquid strap-ons (both pressure and pump fed with various propellants); all the way to a completely reusable liquid fly back booster (complete with air breathing engines for controlled landing and return). All of these possibilities appear to offer improvements in varying degrees; and each has their strengths and weaknesses from both programmatic and technical points of view. The most beneficial booster upgrade/design, if the shuttle program were to continue long enough to justify the required investment, would be an approach that greatly increased both vehicle and crew safety. This would be accomplished by increasing the minimum range/minimum altitude envelope that would readily allow abort to orbit (ATO), possibly even to zero/zero, and possibly reduce or eliminate the Return to Launch Site (RTLS) and even the Trans Atlantic Landing (TAL) abort mode requirements. This paper will briefly survey and discuss all of the various booster'upgrade options studied previously, and compare their relative attributes. The survey will explicitly discuss, in summary comparative form, options that include: five segment solids; several hybrid possibilities; pressure and/or pump-fed liquids using either LO2/kerosene, H2O/kerosene and LO2/J2, any of which could be either fully expendable, partly or fully reusable; and finally a fully reusable liquid fly back booster system, with a number of propellant and propulsion system options. Performance and configuration comparison illustrations and tables will be included to provide a comprehensive survey for the paper.
机译:只要此发射系统保持运行状态,航天飞机计划的永无止境的主要目标就是不断提高飞行安全性。在过去的几十年中,一直在认真研究提高系统安全性和提高车辆性能的一种选择,那就是用功能更强大的装置代替现有的绑带式四段式固体火箭助推器(SRB)。已经对许多增压器升级选项进行了详细研究,包括从五段固体到混合动力以及各种液体束缚(压力和泵中都装有各种推进剂)。一直到完全可重复使用的液体反激助力器(配有可呼吸的发动机,以控制着陆和返回)。所有这些可能性似乎都在不同程度上提供了改进。从程序和技术的角度来看,每种方法都有其优点和缺点。如果航天飞机计划持续足够长的时间以证明所需的投资合理,那么最有益的助推器升级/设计将是一种可大大提高车辆和乘员安全性的方法。这可以通过增加最小范围/最小高度范围来实现,该范围将允许堕胎进入轨道(ATO),甚至可能达到零/零,并可能减少或消除返回发射点(RTLS)甚至跨大西洋着陆(TAL)中止模式要求。本文将简要调查和讨论先前研究的所有各种booster'upgrade选项,并比较它们的相对属性。该调查将以摘要比较形式明确讨论各种选择,其中包括:五个段实体;几种混合可能性;使用LO2 /煤油,H2O /煤油和LO2 / J2加压和/或泵送液体,其中任何一种都可以完全消耗,部分或完全可重复使用;最后是完全可重复使用的液体反激式助推器系统,并带有多种推进剂和推进系统选项。性能和配置比较插图和表格将包括在内,以提供对本文的全面调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号